Canadian Politics Today

buddy... where was your fake outrage decades back? It was gold reading your OWN GOAL when you provided a 2011 dated article (that speaks back to OECD concerns from 1999 on through to that 2011 date... concerns over Canada's record in prosecuting foreign bribery). It was even sweeter reading you attempting to tie that article to PM Trudeau and 2018's deployment of remediation law - SWEET!

geezaz member Rue... why does the OECD itself use the word GUIDELINES?  Bloody hell you're easy... too easy! Yet another member Rue, "OWN GOAL"!

Waldo the wording you now provide are not  the legal commentary and Annex 1 I provided.  The legal commentary and Annex 1 were not called guidelines because they were not guidelines. The paper you now produce us called a guideline because it us.  The wording I gave you were not called guidelines because they are not, they are in fact direct explanations on how the OECD wants Article V interpreted.

You now pull out something that has nothing to do with the wording I provided and suggest because it's a guideline, anything else the OECD has produced is also a guideline.

At this point Waldo you need to stop.  The more you respond to me the more absurd your attempts to defend your past words become.

If before you knee jerk responded to me you just once readcwhat you produced you would know what the difference is between  a directive as to specific wording interpretation and a policy guideline is.

I have ignored your other remarks which reflect  yet again your inability to control your emotions and childish comments.

Might I suggest you try understand Waldo your continued attempts to reply to me are pointless. My only purpose in making an effort to finish my comments was to demonstrate a level I should have engaged in.

You need to dialogue with someone else now Waldo.