The fact she has engaged a retired SCJ to advise her on what she can say certainly points to something interesting.
So why would she get advice from a retired SCJ about what she can say, if nothing was said?
as she stated in her resignation letter: to advise her on "topics that I am legally permitted to discuss on this matter." Quite shocking for a lawyer to do so, hey
wilberWithBaitedBreath!
by the by, deferred prosecution agreements are everyday, matter-of-fact legal process handling within the U.S./UK... are they a good thing... or not? If not, why not?
do you accept the Oct. 9 ruling by the director of public prosecutions: where SNC-Lavalin was found not eligible for a deferred prosecution agreement - yes or no?