The New York Times comes out in support of the protest.
We disagree with the protesters’ cause, but they have a right to be noisy and even disruptive. Protests are a necessary form of expression in a democratic society, particularly for those whose opinions do not command broad popular support. Governments have a responsibility to prevent violence by protesters, but they must be willing to accept some degree of disruption by those seeking to be heard.
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/02/10/opinion/ottawa-trucker-protests.amp.html
You didn't even read the first sentence that said "we disagree with the protesters' cause?" It clearly comes out in support of protests in general and in opposition to their cause. I can't believe how bad you are at reading.
So NYT supporting protests (but not necessarily occupations and border blockades) is all you could find to prove BLM supports the convoy? Good try.