Canadian Politics Today

The right wing extremists love to throw around innuendo and imply that someone did something wrong or tell outright lies. I applaud Trudeau for calling out lying Scheer. It is high time that people are held account for their actions.

Lawyer letters to your political opponents is asinine.  Harper did the same thing and dropped it.  What an idiotic move...

Extremist?  Is he going to blow up Parliament or try and kick out all the Muslims?

He seems more like a rightwing knob.

We have 3 of the biggest knobs leading our parties, the 3 worst leaders i've seen in a long time.  Maybe you have to be a bit stupid or crazy to get into political leadership these days.

you don't consider Faith Goldy an extremist?

Look in the mirror.

You're her type as well? Call Scheer, he may have a job for ya.

you don't consider Faith Goldy an extremist?

She's far-right.  Sure let's even call her an extremist.

Does the Trudeau's associating with and inviting to dinner a convicted terrorist and violent extremist make them extremists?  https://nationalpost.com/news/national/surrey-man-convicted-in-1986-b-c-terrorist-shooting-poses-with-trudeaus-wife-in-india/wcm/17c677ce-1e98-4010-9cbe-3b6186ba1589

I don't think any legit journalist would categorize Scheer as an extremist. He doesn't even seem to be as right-wing as Maxime Bernier, for example.

ROTFL. So now you are claiming to predict the future?

I'm sorry you don't understand science, but making prediction based upon the best available evidence is done all the time. Again, you seem to be suggesting that we wait for your definition of "real" data. You're saying we shouldn't prepare for what's possible--or as the scientists are saying, "likely"--because predictive modeling is akin to soothsaying to you.

Look, your opinion and views on this are, simply put, idiotic. The only "real" data that would satisfy you is to not do anything until the disaster has happened then try to react to that. The science has already argued that this is not an approach we can take because failing to act before it's too late will mean irreversible damage. You're arguing that we need to wait until the damage is irreversible before doing a damn thing, which, I'm sorry, is just plain stupid.

I'm sorry you don't understand science, but making prediction based upon the best available evidence is done all the time.

You seem to have completely forgotten the context. You made a moronic comment that I was "wrong" because I said the problem could not be fixed. Fixing the problem requires deployment of tech that has not been shown to be economically viable at a massive scale. That is why I laughed at your claimed prophetic abilities. No one can say I am wrong on that statement.

As for you lecture on what science is. What you refuse to acknowledge despite having pointed out over and over again is that not all science is equal. It is not enough for someone to invent a computer model and claim to predict the future. They have to show that that it has a connection to reality with experiments. For example, a model used to predict performance of aircraft under different conditions can be tested with wind tunnels and other apparatus and confirm that the model correctly predicts the outcomes of controlled experiments.  Double blind studies are another tool that can be used to demonstrate a connection with reality.

Such controlled experiments are not possible for almost any climate related claim which means climate claims are not facts or evidence but rather "expert opinion". And when you are dealing with "expert opinion" the objectivity of the experts matter and the facts show that climate science has been completely politicized by zealots that only accept the alarmist narrative. Any scientist who tries to suggest the problem may not be as severe as claimed is systematically attacked by their peers and ultimately forced to recant or leave the field. This politicized environment means no "expert opinion" from a climate scientist is worth more than a scrap of toilet paper.

Filled up my truck today. Diesel was $.34 less than the premium my car uses. The cost of running my 6.7 L diesel 1T and my 2 L gas burning car is getting close to being a wash.

What is the average over a year? I assume diesel is down now because less home heating oil required.

Was Trudeau’s affinity for blackface ever discussed in his brand thread?