only just now saw this thread surface again... and read your slag. Good thing there's been a cooling-off period, cause that was one-hotdamn zinger! You were on fire.
I knew you'd missed my reply, because you're psychologically incapable of letting somebody else have the last word.
You continuously pepper your posts with these little personal digs at me. Mocking my creative writing hobby, mocking my "googly prowess", the "flop sweat" thing from a while back, making fun of the headaches I had been suffering, and so on. You may imagine these antics make you look clever. The truth is, they just make you look like a douche.
Let me give you some insight: I've had to deal with
**** all my life. You're not even a good
****. You're at best a mediocre
****. By
**** standards, you're quite forgettable. You might imagine that your sad antics will get my goat, pull my leg, get me off my game, or so on. Funny, but no.
I have decided to simply pare away all of this excess puff and bluster from your posts and put it under the heading of "waldoing", and address the substance of your posts, which is invariably so tiny.
but really! Your response was so lame/weak
wrong. Your info-graphics were weak. People were talking about significant projects and you posted infographics about
**** bus-shelters. Step up your
**** game.
- surely you didn't need to scour through the lists to pull out 3 or so inconsequential references while purposely skipping over the many, many infrastructure items in the $10-$30+ billion range. Perhaps you should offer-up a reference figure and qualification that aligns with a sanctioned, 'Ms. kimmy Worthy Infrastructure" benchmark... make sure you fully define industry partnership criteria, regulatory aspects, federal versus provincial responsibilities, etc..
There are exactly zero billion-dollar infra-structure items on your infographics. Sorry. More waldo failure.
-k