Author Topic: The problem with the Trudeau government  (Read 566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kimmy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5033
  • Location: Kim City BC
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #30 on: March 06, 2018, 11:07:58 pm »
only just now saw this thread surface again... and read your slag. Good thing there's been a cooling-off period, cause that was one-hotdamn zinger! You were on fire.  :-*

I knew you'd missed my reply, because you're psychologically incapable of letting somebody else have the last word.

You continuously pepper your posts with these little personal digs at me. Mocking my creative writing hobby, mocking my "googly prowess", the "flop sweat" thing from a while back, making fun of the headaches I had been suffering, and so on. You may imagine these antics make you look clever. The truth is, they just make you look like a douche.

Let me give you some insight: I've had to deal with **** all my life. You're not even a good ****. You're at best a mediocre ****.  By **** standards, you're quite forgettable. You might imagine that your sad antics will get my goat, pull my leg, get me off my game, or so on.  Funny, but no.   

I have decided to simply pare away all of this excess puff and bluster from your posts and put it under the heading of "waldoing", and address the substance of your posts, which is invariably so tiny.


but really! Your response was so lame/weak

wrong.  Your info-graphics were weak.  People were talking about significant projects and you posted infographics about **** bus-shelters.  Step up your **** game.

- surely you didn't need to scour through the lists to pull out 3 or so inconsequential references while purposely skipping over the many, many infrastructure items in the $10-$30+ billion range. Perhaps you should offer-up a reference figure and qualification that aligns with a sanctioned, 'Ms. kimmy Worthy Infrastructure" benchmark... make sure you fully define industry partnership criteria, regulatory aspects, federal versus provincial responsibilities, etc..

There are exactly zero billion-dollar infra-structure items on your infographics.  Sorry. More waldo failure.

 -k
Paris - London - New York - Kim City
Like Like x 1 Winner Winner x 1 View List

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8715
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #31 on: March 07, 2018, 12:33:13 am »
making fun of the headaches I had been suffering

BS! As I recall you asked "the board" for advice on your headache... I believe I provided a link to a medical site detailing a possible basis for your described symptoms. I think you actually thanked me.

Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Offline kimmy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5033
  • Location: Kim City BC
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #32 on: March 07, 2018, 12:39:28 am »
BS! As I recall you asked "the board" for advice on your headache... I believe I provided a link to a medical site detailing a possible basis for your described symptoms. I think you actually thanked me.

yeah, and then in a different thread you suggested that the headaches were me causing mental impairment that made me unable to grasp your brilliant arguments.

 -k
Paris - London - New York - Kim City

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8715
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #33 on: March 07, 2018, 12:53:23 am »
I knew you'd missed my reply, because you're psychologically incapable of letting somebody else have the last word.

do you feel entitled... to the last word? Just cause?  ;D Hey sista, if you can't take the heat perhaps you should spend more time amateur-hour sleuthing and less time on discussion boards dealing with someone who, apparently, has the audacity to question/challenge you!

You continuously pepper your posts with these little personal digs at me. Mocking my creative writing hobby, mocking my "googly prowess", the "flop sweat" thing from a while back, making fun of the headaches I had been suffering, and so on. You may imagine these antics make you look clever. The truth is, they just make you look like a douche.
{waldo: I stuck out the above BS statement you made stating I made fun of your headaches... as mentioned/detailed in the separate post I made calling this BS}

I never take the initiative to personalize - but I most certainly will come back at you or anyone else that does so. I give as good as I get... no wait, I give better! Wait, are you claiming you're a delicate flower and haven't repeatedly made your own digs at others?

Let me give you some insight: I've had to deal with **** all my life. You're not even a good ****. You're at best a mediocre ****.  By **** standards, you're quite forgettable. You might imagine that your sad antics will get my goat, pull my leg, get me off my game, or so on.  Funny, but no.

what is it about you that so attracts the many **** you claim? You seem to be going out of your way to qualify my forgettable assholiness!  ;D So forgettable, hey!   

wrong.  Your info-graphics were weak.  People were talking about significant projects and you posted infographics about **** bus-shelters.  Step up your **** game.

There are exactly zero billion-dollar infra-structure items on your infographics.  Sorry. More waldo failure.

ya, ya... I guess it was a stretch for you to actually look into the Infrastructure Canada website and actually select those respective links for details. I would have thought someone with your amateur-hour sleuthing chops would have been able to handle that. But like I said, how pitiful is your "argument" that you somehow manage to find such less impacting items but can't manage to actually find the brazillion dollar ones? Notwithstanding your deflection here from the pointed question I asked you about defining the Ms. kimmy benchmark for worthy infrastructure... you know, noting your dollar figure and the caveats I included. Can you manage that, hey?
Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8715
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #34 on: March 07, 2018, 12:54:17 am »
yeah, and then in a different thread you suggested that the headaches were me causing mental impairment that made me unable to grasp your brilliant arguments.

if that's the case, put up a link... and I'll gladly apologize for doing so.

Offline kimmy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5033
  • Location: Kim City BC
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #35 on: March 08, 2018, 09:16:32 am »
I was sure it had happened, yet I can't find any evidence that it did. Therefore I withdraw the claim, and offer a barely sincere apology.

 -k
Paris - London - New York - Kim City

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #36 on: March 08, 2018, 11:00:29 am »
I was sure it had happened, yet I can't find any evidence that it did. Therefore I withdraw the claim, and offer a barely sincere apology.

 -k

You could have just written it as a cite, but not included a link, then invited him to find it if he disagreed.
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8715
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #37 on: March 08, 2018, 11:35:14 am »
I was sure it had happened, yet I can't find any evidence that it did. Therefore I withdraw the claim, and offer a barely sincere apology.

no worries - I offer you a barely sincere acceptance of your "apology"

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8715
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #38 on: March 08, 2018, 11:37:01 am »
You could have just written it as a cite, but not included a link, then invited him to find it if he disagreed.

weasel is as weasel does

Offline fedup

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #39 on: March 10, 2018, 04:21:16 pm »
typical "well researched" Argus cut-&-paste opinion piece! ;D


Liberals to delay billions in planned infrastructure spending --- Ottawa regularly has to carry over infrastructure money from one fiscal year to the next



Well, that money is needed to take care of all those wonderful new legal and illegal refugees that Canada keeps importing in every year. We need to spend billions to help them to settle in and learn how to take advantage of the Canadian welfare system. Canadians need to help them out in anyway that we can. Canada does need an extra 350,000 new immigrants to keep the unemployment lines alive and well.

Offline ?Impact

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #40 on: March 16, 2018, 01:51:26 pm »
I'm pissed at the Trudeau government, they have managed to screw things up royally. When I checked the Environment Canada forecast at the beginning of the week, this weekend was supposed to be sunny and +6 & +5. Well they can't get anything right, because it now says chance of flurries and -6 & -4.

I'm voting for Andrew Scheer because he knows how to control the weather. He grew up in Ottawa, went to school and University there, moved to Regina to finish his BA and worked for about 4 years there before returning to Ottawa. He is however a representative from Regina - go figure. He can control the weather; he will just make me think it is warm and sunny just like he makes people in Regina think he has any affiliation with them.
Funny Funny x 2 Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Offline kimmy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5033
  • Location: Kim City BC
Re: The problem with the Trudeau government
« Reply #41 on: August 30, 2018, 10:12:27 pm »
We continue to have trouble getting anything big done in Canada. We have trouble building LNG plants, pipelines or enough subways; we suffer from major regulatory creep and our big cities are hamstrung with little money for infrastructure and, as a consequence, our economy performs far below potential. Whatever growth we have is based on credit-driven consumer spending facilitated by ultralow interest rates – not by industrial and infrastructure development. We do reasonably well by Group of Seven standards, but that's not the measure. Why set the bar so low? What is our potential? We seem content with 2-per-cent growth and 6-per-cent unemployment. Our economy can't even perform with an 80-cent dollar. We lack a performance-driven competitive culture and an urgency to accomplish big things.
This is a government that just accepts we must sell our oil at a huge discount to the world market. Have they calculated how much we have lost? Are they concerned our stock market has been the worst performer on the planet for a decade? Does anyone care? The markets are telling us Canada does not seem to be a good place to invest right now.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/in-justin-trudeaus-canada-we-still-cant-get-anything-big-done/article38086398/


Well, apparently Trudeau couldn't get the pipeline done after all.

But hey, we've still got the "Pat And The Elephant"  para-transit van!

 -k
Paris - London - New York - Kim City