Author Topic: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)  (Read 18751 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Black Dog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4715
  • Location: Deathbridge
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1425 on: October 21, 2022, 09:52:33 am »
Anyone else really alarmed that a bunch of low-education truck drivers brought the nation's capital to its knees for weeks, paralyzing all 3 levels of government?

You'd think the convoy was taking live hostages for something.  Be careful....they have loud horns!

Some people here were calling that out from the jump.

Offline Based Shady

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3868
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1426 on: October 21, 2022, 12:49:23 pm »
And the Oscar for best actress and biggest hypocrite (#freedom) goes to:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJwcYowaKFA
He’s a piece of s**t.  Picks and chooses when body autonomy and medical privacy exist, and when they don’t.  He and his ilk have no credibility.
Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1427 on: October 21, 2022, 12:59:31 pm »
Says the guy who exercises his freedom to choose not to take the vaccine but feels he should have a say over whether a woman can get an abortion.

Offline Based Shady

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3868
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1428 on: October 21, 2022, 01:26:07 pm »
Says the guy who exercises his freedom to choose not to take the vaccine but feels he should have a say over whether a woman can get an abortion.
That’s just not true.  I have already stated several times that abortion before a certain point is acceptable.  You’re the extremist that’s for abortion at any time, for any reason.  Btw, requiring something from somebody else isn’t a freedom.  You still don’t understand what freedoms are.  Exercising a freedom shouldn’t require anything from anybody else.  If it does, it ceases to be a freedom.
Dumb Dumb x 2 View List

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1429 on: October 21, 2022, 01:38:40 pm »
Why do you think your opinion on a woman's pregnancy should be considered at all...if you really believe in bodily autonomy?
Nobody should be forced to provide abortions and no one is suggesting they should be. So there goes that argument. 😂

Offline Queefer Sutherland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8131
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1430 on: November 02, 2022, 07:45:30 pm »
Sooooo Doug Ford's gov wants to use the notwithstanding clause to break the union for education support workers, and the Trudeau gov is mad saying they are curtailing their rights.

Meanwhile the Trudeau gov used the Emergencies Act to curtail people's rights who were engaging in illegal behaviour (parking vehicles in the street for weeks, honking horns at night, blocking bridges) without actually trying to enforce the laws already on the books.
I queef, therefore I am.
Agree Agree x 1 Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Offline kimmy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4751
  • Location: Kim City BC
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1431 on: November 02, 2022, 09:07:50 pm »
Sooooo Doug Ford's gov wants to use the notwithstanding clause to break the union for education support workers, and the Trudeau gov is mad saying they are curtailing their rights.

Meanwhile the Trudeau gov used the Emergencies Act to curtail people's rights who were engaging in illegal behaviour (parking vehicles in the street for weeks, honking horns at night, blocking bridges) without actually trying to enforce the laws already on the books.

Yes, invoking Emergency Measures so nonchalantly makes their criticism of Ford on this ring hollow.

Meanwhile, RCMP commish Brenda Lucki's cell phone text messages were released to the inquiry.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-top-mountie-cant-explain-text-messages-in-which-she-suggested-federal/

Quote
According to the Emergencies Act, a public order emergency can be declared only when threats to the security of Canada are so serious that they constitute a national crisis that cannot be effectively dealt with under any other existing law.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked the act on Feb. 14.

The police operation to clear the protests in Ottawa began on Feb. 18 and ended on Feb. 20. The texts released to the inquiry show that on Feb. 19 Commissioner Lucki told her OPP counterpart, Thomas Carrique, that the federal government could ask them for a letter supporting the use of the Emergencies Act retroactively.

“Has Minister Blair hit you up for a letter to support the EA?” she asked Commissioner Carrique.

He replied that he had not and asked if he should expect to hear from Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair. Commissioner Lucki did not answer over text and instead said she was calling Commissioner Carrique.

On Monday Commissioner Lucki told reporters she was “never” requested to write a letter. But she couldn’t explain why she sent the text to Commissioner Carrique.

“It was conversation in a text, I’m not sure,” she told reporters.

LMAO

Quote
Commissioner Lucki’s texts also show that she twice asked Commissioner Carrique about using a different messaging app that she said does “not store deleted messages.”

LOL

Quote
In her text conversation with Commissioner Carrique, the top Mountie also floated the idea of putting Canadian Armed Forces members in RCMP uniforms and then incorporating them in the police response to the convoy.

LOOOOLLL.  "Soldiers with guns. Disguised as RCMP officers. In our cities. In Canada. We're not making this up."

This is the second Brenda Lucki scandal in just a couple of weeks, after the release of an audio recording that proves that her testimony to the Nova Scotia Mass Casualties Inquiry was a huge lie.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/recording-rcmp-phone-meeting-political-interference-allegations-1.6623287

It's also the second time in just a couple of weeks that Lucki has been exposed as being just a henchman for Bill Blair, which makes the RCMP mandate of independence look laughable.

Lucki needs to be gone, immediately.


 -k
Paris - London - New York - Kim City

Offline Queefer Sutherland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8131
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1432 on: November 02, 2022, 09:22:47 pm »
Wow.

"Could you please change your app so that it can delete messages sso that I don't incriminate myself".

Retroactive approval recommendation for the Emergencies Act HAHAHAHAH. 

Crap really hits the fan when you have multiple levels of government and so leaders can't just push everyone around to get what they want.
I queef, therefore I am.

Offline MH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10772
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1433 on: November 03, 2022, 05:22:45 am »
Sooooo Doug Ford's gov wants to use the notwithstanding clause to break the union for education support workers, and the Trudeau gov is mad saying they are curtailing their rights.

Meanwhile the Trudeau gov used the Emergencies Act to curtail people's rights who were engaging in illegal behaviour (parking vehicles in the street for weeks, honking horns at night, blocking bridges) without actually trying to enforce the laws already on the books.

You need to look at the negative impacts..

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2364
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1434 on: November 03, 2022, 08:08:40 am »
Yes, invoking Emergency Measures so nonchalantly makes their criticism of Ford on this ring hollow.

LMAO

LOL

LOOOOLLL.


 -k

Turns out police and CSIS members were colluding with convoy protesters to overthrow an elected government, so it seems to be justified. And given the inquiry afterward, it doesn't seem nonchalant at all.

Offline Queefer Sutherland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8131
Re: Trucker convoy (non-censor edition)
« Reply #1435 on: November 03, 2022, 09:57:41 am »
You need to look at the negative impacts..

Like what?
I queef, therefore I am.