Thanks. The image waldo posted didn’t have that in it. That’s still not anti vaccine. How is wanting a medicine to go through the normal approval process complete with peer review anti-vaxx? Answer. It’s not. It’s completely reasonable. I understand that it’s a position you people disagree with, but it’s not a ridiculous request, and doesn’t fit the definition of anti-vaxx.
Demanding a halt to a vaccine that has been peer reviewed and proven safe and effective based on spurious claims of its harms is an anti-vaxx position.
Of course this particular MPP has spread COVID disinformation in the past as well.