Author Topic: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)  (Read 18060 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline L.A. Shady

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #795 on: March 01, 2023, 07:51:50 pm »
wait, what? You're saying the image of the claimed Poilievre written statement calling Ms. Anderson's views vile is... meaningless? Oh my!
Which views are being referred to as vile?  Come on buddy, I know you can do it.  I have faith in you! 😂

Offline L.A. Shady

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #796 on: March 01, 2023, 07:54:08 pm »
Are you saying peepee is full of crap and is being woke for political gain. I have a party with more pees for you
You gonna finally post something detailing her supposed vile policies?  It really shouldnít be this difficult. 

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4019
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #797 on: March 01, 2023, 08:40:36 pm »
As I said, their platform is all things you totally agree with: anti-immigrant, anti-vax, anti-diversity, pro-tax cuts for the rich, etc. And peepee agrees you people are vile.
"I have worked hard to represent people of all backgrounds and I have always done so in a spirit of tolerance. My reference to the term 'tar baby' was a common reference that refers to issues that stick to one." - Pierre Poilievre

Offline L.A. Shady

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #798 on: March 01, 2023, 08:51:39 pm »
As I said, their platform is all things you totally agree with: anti-immigrant, anti-vax, anti-diversity, pro-tax cuts for the rich, etc. And peepee agrees you people are vile.
One can disagree with those things, but thatís hardly vile policies.  Thereís gotta be Mira you can provide.  Something sheís written or said?  A speech maybe?  An interview?  Something?

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4019
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #799 on: March 01, 2023, 09:28:55 pm »
 I think you are clearly a Maxime guy. Don't vote for someone who calls you vile.
"I have worked hard to represent people of all backgrounds and I have always done so in a spirit of tolerance. My reference to the term 'tar baby' was a common reference that refers to issues that stick to one." - Pierre Poilievre
Winner Winner x 1 View List

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #800 on: March 05, 2023, 06:42:33 pm »
so... other than this claimed PeePee statement from the Sun's resident Conservative lapdog "journalist", 'lilleypad', still nuthin from an actual Poilievre and/or CPC outlet - go figure, hey!


Poilievre/CPC thought the manufactured performative media-driven foreign election interference story would have buried this CPC MPs meeting event with a far-right German extremist, Christine Anderson... that if they just continued to ignore it, it would just go away! But alas, some media wags continue to try to ask Poilievre related questions about Anderson and why 3 of his caucus MPs (including a prominent shadow minister) met with her. The latest in recent days had PeePee delivering yet another 'Canada is broken' prepared message only to have another journalist attempt to ask inconvenient questions... which caused Poilievre to bolt (runaway, runaway)!


Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #801 on: March 06, 2023, 01:07:22 pm »
PoiLIEvre is a g-damn liar! So PeePee just finished a prepared presser targeting Canada's current Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) law... specifically misinforming/lying about mental illness eligibility.



Reality: On February 2, 2023, the Government of Canada introduced legislation to extend the temporary exclusion of eligibility in circumstances where a person's sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness for a period of one-year, until March 17, 2024.

Quote from: David Lametti, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
There is no doubt that medical assistance in dying is a very complex and deeply personal issue. We strongly believe that the proposed one-year extension, until March 17, 2024, of the temporary exclusion of eligibility for persons whose sole medical condition is a mental illness will provide sufficient time to ensure our health care system protects those who may be vulnerable and support autonomy and freedom of choice.

Quote from: Jean-Yves Duclos, Minister of Health
As MAID is a very personal and complex issue, the temporary extension would allow more time for regulators, clinicians, and others to better understand and implement guidelines and practices. This extension would play a crucial role in protecting the most vulnerable while supporting their autonomy, and ensuring assessors and providers are prepared and comfortable to support MAID for persons living with a mental illness, when it becomes available.

Quote from: Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health
The safety and security of Canadians, including the most vulnerable, remains at the centre of our actions, alongside supporting individual autonomy. Canadians can rest assured weíre taking a careful and considered approach on the implementation of MAID for persons living with a mental illness.

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #802 on: March 07, 2023, 10:01:19 am »
PoiLIEvre is a g-damn liar! So PeePee just finished a prepared presser targeting Canada's current Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) law... specifically misinforming/lying about mental illness eligibility.



Reality: On February 2, 2023, the Government of Canada introduced legislation to extend the temporary exclusion of eligibility in circumstances where a person's sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness for a period of one-year, until March 17, 2024.

PeePee continuing with his lie:


Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #803 on: March 07, 2023, 10:28:48 am »
oh my! Misogynist publicly calls his wife "hot"! LOL


Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #804 on: March 08, 2023, 01:56:30 pm »

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4019
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #805 on: March 08, 2023, 02:01:48 pm »
oh my! Misogynist publicly calls his wife "hot"! LOL


Bicep totally photoshopped.
"I have worked hard to represent people of all backgrounds and I have always done so in a spirit of tolerance. My reference to the term 'tar baby' was a common reference that refers to issues that stick to one." - Pierre Poilievre

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #806 on: March 08, 2023, 05:16:28 pm »
Bicep totally photoshopped.

Popilievre: I yam what I yam!

Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #807 on: March 09, 2023, 02:12:42 am »
so-called "journalists" taking a run @ Jagmeet


Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7480
Re: Opposition Parties (uncensored thread)
« Reply #808 on: March 09, 2023, 10:05:52 am »


Pierre Poilievreís know-nothing populism is a dangerous delusion - National Observer | Max Fawcett | March 7th 2023

Quote
Thereís a lesson here that Canadian conservatives like Poilievre could stand to learn. No, experts arenít infallible, and nobody is actually suggesting they should be listened to uncritically. But the world we live in is underwritten by expertise and experts, now more than ever before. From the people who design and deliver our internet services to the medical innovations that have both extended our lifespans and increased their quality, we depend (and are dependent) on expertise in ways even our recent ancestors couldnít have imagined.

To pretend otherwise, as Poilievre and his fellow populists seem determined to do, isnít just foolish or naive. Itís corrosive to the shared project we call society. But, then, maybe thatís part of his plan. Conservatives have never been big on the idea of a society, much less one thatís defined by things like common purpose and shared ideals rather than freedom and liberty. And experts, with their stubborn belief in things like evidence and data, are a natural antagonist to anyone trading in populist sloganeering. Itís no wonder Poilievre seems to find them so threatening ó and so dangerous.

Offline Black Dog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7236
  • Location: Deathbridge