Wholly molly...If these Sikhs voted for J.Singh because, as you suspect, J.Singh is a Sikh, then they are vile disgusting tribalists.
Correct. If they voted for him (and funded him) because of his ethnicity, which many of them obviously did, though i'm sure not all.
If these Sikhs consider your position; agree and don't vote for J.Singh because J.Singh is a sikh, then they are equally disgusting.
Sure.
On the other hand, If these Sikhs voted for J.Singh because they believe him to be the best candidate for the job then you approve.
Correct.
However you know they did no such thing and so they are disgusting.
I'd wager most of them didn't, though very likely some voted for him irrelevant of his ethnicity.
I'm curious, under what condition would their actions meet your approval? Apparently, your suspicions would vanish if they had voted for anyone but J.Singh because J.Singh is a Sikh....But thats Vile and Disgusting.
Your argument is illogical and you're creating strawmans from my argument. The voting action I would approve of is when people vote for the candidate they think has the best national policies regardless of their tribe or ethnicity. If Sikh's voted for all of the NDP candidates in roughly the same proportions that every other ethnicity did, then that would be the ideal, wouldn't it?
Do you want whites voting for whites, Sikh's for Sikh's, Chinese for Chinese, men for men, women for women etc? Do you find this healthy or harmful to our democracy? Divisive or unifying?