It's not that easy to assess a refugee claim, which is a claim for permanent residence. You have to go to the often third world country with crappy governments and get police checks from them (which could take time if the governments are slow), you have to do medical checks by a doctor here, you have to do investigations on the claim itself to see if this person's story checks out, which means contacting & investigating people in the home country, possibly involving CSIS agents in that country etc. etc.
Oh please don't tell me you think we do any of that now.
I mean, do you imagine we could actually get honest police checks from a brutal dictatorial government which someone has fled from? And how would we 'check out' their story anyway? Send agents to Syria or Iran or wherever to interview government officials and ask them if they're trying to murder some innocent person? You know we don't actually have any foreign agents, right? CSIS CAN go abroad, but only with the permission of the other government involved. They are not spies. We are the only G7 nation with no foreign intelligence service.
All we do with asylum claimants is check their prints to see if any western country knows them from somewhere. Then it's simply up to whatever story they tell. If the story kinda, sorta sounds legit (and they have a year with an immigration lawyer to concoct it) then that's mostly it.
BUT
We could simply screen most of the applicants coming across the border right away because they don't have any valid claim to fleeing persecution based on race, religion, nationality or membership in a specific group. I don't think the Haitians can really claim they're afraid all the anti-whatever in Haiti want them dead. There's no racial, religious or ethnic thing going on there or in Somalia or Nigeria that requires people come here to claim asylum. I mean, Nigeria does have some small insurgency in parts of the north, but the rest of the country is perfectly safe.
The notwithstanding clause is controversial, i sympathize with your argument, but these people also deserve basic due process,[/quote]
Which is why I said give them a hearing, and then an appeal process. You don't actually need to equate 'basic due process' with 'eight years of repeated appeals on multiple grounds through the court system at our expense'.