We already vet the choice, abortions are not performed beyond 24 months, are you in favour of allowing them at any time?
I'm surprised so called feminists would support abortions solely on the basis of the foetus being female.
Ask yourself why we allow abortions at all. I suggest it is so that a women cannot be forced to undergo a pregnancy, and all the related medical procedures, and then have to go through labour, and end up with a child she does not want.
What pro life people say is that this should not be allowed, as the foetus is a sacred life and should be brought to term in every case. I disagree with that but respect the right to the view.
What you are saying is that we should allow a women to choose to have an abortion for the reasons I stated above, which means we put the rights of the woman above those of the foetus, but then, at some point, we say "Hang on a minute! Why do do you want an abortion?", and based on the answer, decide to completely reverse our position. Put the rights of the foetus above those of the woman, and force her to undergo a pregnancy, endure all the related medical procedures, go through labour, and end up with a child she does not want. Just because you don't like the choice. You don't. That is not pro choice.
As to your question, I see 24 weeks as arbitrary, (24 months seems a little barbaric) but as you have stated, at some point the medical professionals required might not want to perform an abortion due to the viability of the foetus. I would not advocate sanctions for any that did.