How so?
"Nanos ... never relies upon voluntary participation..."
Involuntary respondents? Lol
hey now! Since this is a thread I created... does anyone know if existing threads are 'grandfathered' and won't be included in the new moderation policy that would allow me to smite this member Granny comment?
ok, ok, the waldo accepts missing context... although that context has been included in many prior posts. Again, Angus Reid/Leger rely upon creating
a 'closed-shop' of voluntary participants - those who are willing to join the club based upon offered "incentives/rewards"... certainly not representative of
random involuntary public sampling... of willing participants within that involuntary sampling!!! ---