Does the "L" in your reference to BLT's stand for the "legs" you were speaking of that women could cut off instead of having abortions? Scheer and Harper might get some sort of weird giggle out of that but I suspect and certainly hope that very few Canadians share that thype of intellect.
You're offended because i said nobody would interfere if a woman wanted the right to cut off her own legs, but some do want to interfere with her right to kill the life she's carrying? The life that can't speak or advocate for itself, has no consent to being created or destroyed, and has no advocates besides "anti-choice" supporters. Do you think i'm being misogynist? Does it offend you that millions of unborn kids are being killed each year?
Maybe i have this crazy sense of morality and responsibility that thinks a woman shouldn't consent to having a man cum in her, with or without birth control, until she is ready to accept all the risks and responsibilities that come with that choice. If a man cums inside a woman, with or without birth control, without her expressed consent, he should be charged with
**** and sent to jail, and abortions allowed in those cases, because yes she should have choice to consent because yes it is her body.
The right to kill human life because people think they have the unalienable right to 5 seconds of pleasure without consequence is the most selfish and horrific right in a modern liberal democracy i can think of. It has led to millions of unborn babies being killed every year. A damned holocaust of unborn lives on a scale far larger than the nazi holocaust. But most people don't consider this because they want to
****. Meanwhile some of these same people are vegan hypocrites who think it's immoral to eat dairy because it's cruel!...but fetuses?
**** em!