Do you think the issues with our healthcare system are so dire that we need "radical re-thinking"? Because frankly if you show up to an emergency room with a life-threatening problem, you're seen and cared for immediately
That is not a metric for how successful we are, unfortunately. That is a basic requirement of the system.
. Wait time problems are for non-emergency care and diagnostics and elective procedures. If you're severely ill or your life is in danger, you are treated immediately without having to pay out of pocket or negotiate with insurance providers, etc. So I don't think we have a dire problem that requires "radical" change. We have a relatively minor issue with it taking far too long for non-essential services.
I learned a good lesson in business about 5 years ago: there are always 3 groups to satisfy when working on an endeavour. There are the customers, the workers, and the owners of the enterprise. In healthcare, this roughly equates to patients, healthcare workers, and taxpayers. The system has to constantly improve in terms of timing, quality of care, and cost over time. It has to.
You can't measure it by "my life was saved" - or you will constantly be comparing it to the worst aspects of the American system, and will eventually compare favourably only to that, not to European systems. The Ontario Liberals seem to have been stealthily cutting back somehow on education and healthcare, I suspect to balance the budget. My wife has been saying that the school board has increased class sizes but it hasn't been reported.
The press is the proxy for the owners/taxpayers in the equation I put above, but they are no longer up to the task of monitoring the system. We have to do it ourselves. And if we take care of all three groups as a negotiation, it doesn't have to be about party politics. In fact, party politics will destroy our healthcare system because people will defend a bad system for party loyalty and identity purposes.