how much credence are you prepared to give to U.S. 'Trump-era' politicization of claimed infringement on intellectual property... particularly when Trump scuttled the TPP and in so doing... the American/Obama admin led efforts towards including TPP provisional coverage for IP in areas such as patents and pharmaceuticals, copyright, Internet service provider (ISP) liability, and IP rights enforcement? How much credence, hey?
I think we should give this a lot of credence, and so do our other allies like the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. China isn't our friend, Wuhan Waldo.
member kimmy, such a childish statement is yours! Of course my comment went right over your peanut-brain! Clearly Trump/admin are engaged in iterative trade 'engagements' with China; aka, the most significant Trump politicization of any statements and policies toward China. Once member wilber's article finished dredging up the 2004 Nortel scenario, the article spun into Trump admin claims/statements toward China. Notwithstanding this most overt Trump/admin politicization, I also highlighted the Trump/admin actions in the pulling out of TPP... the resulting remnants, CPTPP, do not include those most pointed and direct provisions intended to deal with IP concerns, broadly and implied towards China. And you want to put credence toward anything coming from Trump/admin? Well, sure...
your naivety always leads your way! 
Home
Contact
Login
Register