Author Topic: The Official Opposition thread (was O’Toole thread)  (Read 11461 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Michael Hardner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12477
And he calls the locals who don’t want the extra noise in their neighbourhood “gatekeepers”. 

Hey @MH , would you be affected by the increased noise?
Nope, I moved pretty far from downtown...
At one point I lived basically on Bathurst Street and I had a business flight ✈️ from there one morning so I WALKED TO THE AIRPORT 😃

I don't know why Poilievre wants this.  It's one of those municipal issues that comes up every few years...
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline Queefer Sutherland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10193
Re: The Official Opposition thread (was O’Toole thread)
« Reply #406 on: September 09, 2023, 08:11:08 pm »
Well whatever one thinks of PP his wife sure seems like a good catch.  Looks like an asset for him, she's more likeable than he is, but I guess that's common with politicians.

Haven't watched PPs full speech yet.  It's way too long
"Nipples is one of the great minds of our time!" - Bubbermiley

guest18

  • Guest
Re: The Official Opposition thread (was O’Toole thread)
« Reply #407 on: September 19, 2023, 07:39:05 am »
Peepee accidentally (by force of habit?) says the n-word yesterday. If that were Trudeau, I'm sure shady would already have a thread going to express his righteous shock and disgust. 😂

Offline Squidward von Squidderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5630
Poilievre doubling down on his idiotic anti-vax stupidity.  I guess he figures he’s far enough in the lead that he can go full retard. 

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7007562

Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

guest18

  • Guest
It's because, in retrospect, now that the vaccine was extraordinarily successful, people realize how stupid you anti-vaxxers were, so it seems dumb to pander to you now that you've already been proven wrong and humiliated.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline Coolio

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1536
It's because, in retrospect, now that the vaccine was extraordinarily successful, people realize how stupid you anti-vaxxers were, so it seems dumb to pander to you now that you've already been proven wrong and humiliated.

I still remember a time not too long ago, during my childhood 40 years ago, when not vaccinating your children shortly after they were born, would raise eyebrows, and society, in general would frown upon the parents. Today, due to misinformation campaigns, and the absence of critical thinking, the anti-vaxx movement has flourished, resulting in thousands of needless deaths in North America, as well as an increase in diseases like measles, once thought to have been virtually eliminated.

The anti-vaxx movement hates children.

guest18

  • Guest
Someone’s rights have nothing to do with whether a medicine is “successful” or not.  Quit being an idiot.
How come you always scurry away when asked what rights were violated, and why the notwithstanding clause wasn't needed like it is when you want to out gay kids?

guest18

  • Guest
These rights a$$hole.

External review found military's COVID-19 vaccine policy violated Charter of Rights
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/military-covid-19-vaccine-policy-charter-1.6924862
It's nice to see you taking the Charter seriously. How come they didn't need to use the notwithstanding clause? How come you guys immediately use the Charter as toilet paper when you want to politicize LGBT people?

guest18

  • Guest
I'm not moving goalposts. You're the one who feels it's okay to violate the Charter to invade people's privacy but not okay if you "feel" the Charter was violated, even without use of the notwithstanding clause or any Charter challenge in court.

guest18

  • Guest
Now that you’ve been shown what people had their charter rights violated, you’re scrambling for a defence.  It’s pathetic.  Just stop insisting that people have their rights taken away.
I haven't been shown anything. If their rights were violated, a court challenge would declare that, and then the government would need to use the notwithstanding clause. Has that happened?

But how come you don't care about the Charter when it is actually violated, like when Saskatchewan used the notwithstanding clause to invade kids' privacy?

guest18

  • Guest
So will the notwithstanding clause need to be enacted or is this just someone's opinion that won't stand up in court? Asking for a friend.

Why did you ignore my question? Does it have to do with being chickensh*t?

Offline Squidward von Squidderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5630
So will the notwithstanding clause need to be enacted or is this just someone's opinion that won't stand up in court? Asking for a friend.

Why did you ignore my question? Does it have to do with being chickensh*t?

Even if he does, it’ll be deleted.  He’s banned from my threads.
Dumb Dumb x 1 View List