Author Topic: Canada gunz  (Read 8325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8848
Re: Canada gunz
« Reply #270 on: December 09, 2022, 01:00:28 am »
In regard to the CCFR promo code, it needs to be pointed out that "POLY" isn't a reference to the Polytechnique massacre, it's a reference to the PolySeSouvient anti-gun activist group led by Nathalie Provost, a survivor of the massacre. PolySeSouvient have been dedicated antagonists of gun-owners in general and CCFR in particular for many years. (PolySeSouvient also seem to be the only "experts" the Liberals actually consulted in drafting C-21.)

What happened to Provost and her peers was horrific beyond imagination, but that doesn't make PolySeSouvient exempt from criticism or disagreement.   If they didn't want the memory of the victims of Dec 6. 1989 to be drawn into politics and controversy, maybe they should have named their political activist group something else.

Lol Jesus Christ listen to yourself here.

c'mon kimmy! PolySeSouvient... as in, wait for it, wait for it... Remembering Poly! What's in a name, hey! Geezaz, the Canadian Coalition of Firearms Rights (CCFR) has the audacity to include "Firearms Rights" in its name - of course, in Canada there is no such right to own... to bear... firearms. I've previously detailed some of the gun policies held by the CCFR... the kind of gun society they want for Canada - one straight out of the U.S. gun culture!

kimmy, as the gunner you are, it's not at all surprising you would purposely demean PolySeSouvient... speaking of it as, the only "experts" the Liberals actually consulted in drafting C-21. Again, Bill C-21 is in committee before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security... the Bill is most certainly not finalized yet! In earlier posts I detailed the methodology/processes to engage the public and stakeholders towards defining a 'final list' of targeted firearms. Point in fact: as of the committee's Dec 6 meeting, 63 unique witnesses have given testimony with several of them appearing multiple times through the iterative meetings held... why even your favoured CEO & Executive Director of the CCFR has given testimony before the committee!