You're the one who tried to pass off a revisionist history of the conversation. You apparently don't like having your "alternative facts" corrected.
we're approaching 2 months since that, as you say, "conversation" - and you keep dredging this up; something that is long past relevant to today! Apparently you think the loss of specifics to that conversation plays to your strength in obscuring what was actually said. I've re-quoted (several times now) the salient points and bullshyte claims you've made against me. The only revisionism is yours! Again, my questioning how the interaction figure was arrived at isn't presenting, as you say, alternative facts... or as you stated previously, wasn't me attempting to counter the figure you so willingly and blindly accepted. I gave you nothing to correct - I simply questioned how something was arrived at! Of course this caused you to wigOut, to meltDown. If you had any intellectual honesty you would have simply accepted YOUR experts were not transparent in how they presented their info/data/results. Of course, intellectual honesty is the last thing you ascribe to - it's not a part of your inherent makeup! You're a poser - bigTime!
Regardless, I won't hold myself responsible for your literacy problems.
there were several members who interpreted what you stated the same way I did. Having your selfish callous nature highlighted clearly bothered you. And now go with all you have left... singularly attribute the multiple member interpretations to me, and offer a summary dismissal! Like I said, you nothing but a poser - bigTime!
My experts? They're the government of British Columbia's experts. And given their success in managing the pandemic, I think they have earned our trust.
uhhh... again, this reflects upon something long past relevant to today - and in that proper context,
you gave your trust prior to any earning being done! Again, your revisionism... with you continuing to make up shyte!
Also, what do you mean "bipartisan"? More nonsense driven by your lockdown-as-politics narrative!
being the self-proclaimed literary wizard you posture as, I'm shocked your postured "vast" vocabulary has such a narrow political only attachment to the word 'partisan'! Again, you're such a poser - bigTime!
I'm sure that a few of you sick mofos are hoping for a fresh wave of cases so that you can say "I told you so", but there's no sign that reopening is having any effect.
how sad and pathetic you are! I expect you're one of those, as you say, "sick mofos", who won't acknowledge what lockdowns achieved... believing that they were simply nuisance plays that interfered with your barTime! I expect you're also one of those, as you say, "sick mofos", who believe many want indefinite lockdowns until a vaccine arrives!
I expect you're also one of those, as you say, "sick mofos", who are quite willing to sacrifice the elderly/infirm... so as not to mess with your barTime!
in any case, yes, some some countries have had outbreaks after opening up... and they've reimposed restrictions to deal with them. And in the U.S., disturbingly, many of the states opening back up are the ones that have yet to see falling case rates - no worries, hey!