Author Topic: BACK TO WORK!! It’s just killing old farts  (Read 7057 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kimmy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5033
  • Location: Kim City BC
Re: BACK TO WORK!! It’s just killing old farts
« Reply #285 on: May 25, 2020, 12:20:23 am »
there was no, as you say, waldo counter attempt, there was no waldo blunder, there was no waldo pout. What I most certainly did... and have subsequently done repeatedly, is to highlight and emphasize you haven't a clue as to how that claimed 30% interaction figure was arrived at. And you still don't!

I'm completely comfortable with their claim of a 30% figure. You yourself provided the chart demonstrating 50% less mobility; 50% mobility combined with significantly reduced interactions per trip makes the 30% figure entirely unsurprising.  As I said, I don't need to see their work; I trust our experts.  You used to say trust our experts, until they started saying stuff that disagreed with your preferred narrative, and now you're the new Fox Mulder. "Trust no one! The truth is out there!"

mine was the most innocuous comment - a simple statement that asked (as quoted above) just how has the B.C. Health Authority used the Google COVID-19 Mobility Reports to arrive at the stated 30% level of interaction figure?

Why do you find it so difficult to believe? Given the 50% mobility figure combined with the social distancing measures in place, elimination of large gatherings, plexiglass shields at every cash register, and so on... why is the 30% estimate they've provided so difficult for you to believe?   And what qualifications, sources of data, and other insights do you possess that make your approval of their methodology meaningful to anybody?

And that simple question caused yet another mega member kimmy wigOut including a failed attempt to claim I was trying to counter the figure... that I supposedly blundered in doing so... and that I went into a "pout" over your pompous claims!

Reminder, the claims are not mine, they're from Dr Henry and her excellent staff.   So you're not trying to counter their figures? Then what is your issue exactly? 

None of which is accurate. Per your norm, you turned tail and NOW... NOW... dredge up post exchanges that aren't even topical now! ;D You really should know when to go silent!

I have a busy life. I can't be here to tend to your issues full time. I can imagine that with so little to occupy your time you must be eager for my replies, but you will need to be patient. I will get to you when I get to you.


and per your norm you eventually resorted to making shyte up. Clearly you feel most comfortable as a shroom; again, you blindly accepted a figure that your claimed experts never provided information/data in how it was determined.

and now another member kimmy tell: your statement about the waldo only trusting China's experts shows you're clearly flailing and flummoxed!

The waldo had been happily parroting everything that came down the pike, from China, from the WHO, from Dr Tam, from JT And The Sunshine Gang... You were the Head Sheep among the Sheeple!  But now that Dr Henry and others have endorsed reopening, the waldo is now Mr Skeptic.

 -k
Paris - London - New York - Kim City