Even your snopes article explains, yet again, that this biden mission was NOT designed to provide grants.
What was it designed to do then?
As another poster pointed out, what it was designed to do was described in the article.
From Snopes:
the organization created collaborations that helped cancer patients with things like accessing care, financial support, and community support. According to its website, the 501(c)3 charity brought together dozens of groups and organizations to leverage resources connecting patients to clinical trials, cancer prevention and early detection, and data sharing, for example.So they weren't doing research on "How do I cure this cancer", but they were working on ways to distribute information between researchers, treatment providers, and cancer patients.
You think 75% of contributions for salaries is acceptable?
Again, according to Snopes:
salaries at the charity were set by a compensation committee that used “comparables to other nonprofits” to set compensation rates.Since the charity was not directly involved in direct research, nor direct treatment, it would be expected that the proportion of its revenue allocated to salaries would be higher than (for example) the Red Cross, or Trump's favorite charity, nambla.
Home
Contact
Login
Register