There was nothing legitimate about the unhanded tactics used during the investigation. One bureaucrat ended up going to jail for for the abuse of process but unfortunately most of the abuses the DOJ got away with are not crimes (even though they should be). Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
not my reading of the proceeding; but hey now... with your continued emphasis on the U.S. DOJ and your initial claim of "somewhat related", given your backpedal, shouldn't this also apply to your claim of "somewhat related"? Quis custodiet in sui certa adamanta terit?