Canadian Politics Today

Your opinion is even more worthless than theirs, because yours lacks any kind of introspection and critical thinking.  You’re one of the libtards I was referring to.  It’s easier just to pretend that people voting for Trump are racist, sexist, etc.  That way you don’t have to examine actual issues, and actual reasons why somebody would think that somebody like Trump is a viable solution.

If Trump voters were driven by a genuine interest in finding viable solutions to real problems, they wouldn't be Trump voters. Yours is a self-defeating argument.

The same thing is going to happen in Canada as well if we don’t start to address some serious problems, that the people currently in power continue to ignore and/or downplay.

The problem with this particular part of your argument is it involves ignoring everything that the people you're talking about say they believe.

It’s funny to listen to all the libtards seethe over CNN’s townhall with Trump. 😂

It's funny to watch you fall back in line behind Trump just like everyone knew you would.

But yeah anyway, so much for the liberal media being out to get Trump, huh.

Over the top insanity? Did they try to undermine democracy with a riot? Or did they just criticize Trump for lying and for being a Putin lapdog?

No, but the CIA tried to undermine democracy.

You should explain that theory further so we can all laugh at you.

Noticing the over the top insanity from libtards following Trumps townhall isn’t falling in line with anything.

No one is gonna take lectures about people being over the top from a guy who spent days crying about a cartoon.

A pleasant surprise to see some truth in the mainstream media.  Must be a gut shot to the some here in the forum that fell for this Russia nonsense.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1658206330157408273?s=46&t=C8Zj6S2wjnbPysohBCizdg

Yeah a whole bunch of cronies of a POTUS nominee were just mucking around with Russian contacts during the year of the election because they were all just watching the game together and having beers and it had nothing to do with them having the same political enemies.

There is more evidence that Charges against Trump are imminent...

From: https://www.vox.com/2023/6/6/23750823/trump-indictment-classified-documents-mar-a-lago-jack-smith
Multiple reports indicate that special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation of Trump for the classified documents held at Mar-a-Lago is wrapping up, and some experts expect an indictment of Trump as soon as this week....multiple news outlets reported that investigators had recently told Trump’s legal team he was a target in the documents investigation.

Ok, it may seem rather obvious that "Trump was a target of investigations", but in legalese it tends to occur shortly before an actual indictment.

The article also mentions:

...in the summer of 2021, Trump had a discussion...that was taped by one of Trump’s aides.... Trump objected to recent media claims that General Mark Milley, his Joint Chiefs of Staff chair, stopped him from attacking Iran... (Trump) claimed to have a document with Milley’s own plan to that effect, but that he couldn’t show it to others.

Which is significant because he is contradicting his claim that he had "declassified things with his mind". (Not that that really matters, since it would still be illegal to have the documents, even if they were declassified)

Right now the big question is will he be indicted in Florida or Washington. Since most of his crimes (at least those related to document theft) occurred in Florida (e.g. obstruction), that would be the natural place to hold a trial. But, prosecutors will probably find a more favorable jury pool in Washington, because Florida be cray cray.

Also there is this, regarding Trump associate Mark Meadows...

From: https://www.salon.com/2023/06/08/bullst-meadows-lawyer-denies-he-flipped--but-legal-experts-say-should-be-worried/
"It is understood that the former North Carolina congressman testified as part of a deal for which he has already received limited immunity in exchange for his testimony," the outlet reported, adding that a source briefed on the agreement claimed that it would involve Meadows entering guilty pleas to "unspecified federal crimes." But Meadows attorney George Terwilliger denied the report that his client would enter any guilty pleas.. Terwilliger did not address whether his client had gotten immunity, however.

Meadows has already testified to the grand jury, but his close association with Trump could make any cooperation from him especially damaging to Trump.