https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/stuff-you-need-to-know/news/?message=50612
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Btw, why would documents that could be stored electronically need to be printed out and stored in boxes?
Do you have the Hillary timeline too? Btw, why do you think 30,000 emails were permanently destroyed? Why did the FBI not get to the illegal private server sooner?
The FBI's seizure of 11 sets of classified documents from Mar-a-Lago has raised a litany of questions about presidential records. One of those questions: Why, in the era of digital everything, is the U.S. government still relying so heavily on paper in the first place?The answer: Much of the classified bureaucracy remains a paper world due in no small part to the security vulnerabilities associated with standard commercial devices, national security lawyer Bradley Moss tells Axios.Classified databases and email accounts that meet the federal government's cybersecurity requirements exist, of course, but they generally require sitting at a terminal and viewing the information on a screen. Paper can be a lot easier to work with in a meeting.The President's Daily Brief — a comprehensive and highly classified written summary of U.S. intelligence — was printed out onto physical paper every day until 2012, when it began to be administered via iPads that former President Obama and his inner circle could swipe through in the Oval Office.That changed with Trump, a notorious technophobe with a short attention span who preferred to be briefed orally on a select few intelligence issues."On most days, Trump's PDB comprised three one-page items describing new developments abroad, plus brief updates of ongoing crises in the Middle East," according to an account published by the CIA's Center for the Study of Intelligence.Despite his general resistance to studying intelligence, Trump reportedly sought to hold onto some of the more riveting documents he was personally interested in.
Here's a comprehensive explainer as to why the documents are in print:The fact that this article exists and Shiddy is bringing it up can only mean there's some right-wing kook conspiracy theory about these documents out there.
How is the fact that they were printed out at all relevant?WHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUT
Then why was Hillary able to get in email form?
Regardless, couldn’t the paper documents just get scanned? Regardless, they must exist in electronic form in some manner, unless you still think they’re typed on type writers. Give it a rest already, you’re a clown.
Because that doesn’t make any sense, when it’s much easier to store them on a drive. You people aren’t making any sense. I get it. You hate Trump.
Get what in email form? who cares, how is this relevant?
You're retarded. Like what's even the argument here, that the documents they hauled away were fake?
Classified material. It’s very relevant.
Sounds like the Steele dossier all over again. You never learn do you? You’re like the guinea pig that takes the pellet and gets shocked, over and over and over again. But never learns.
You're basically just throwing crap at the wall to see what sticks here, aren't you.
Steele Dossier! Hillary's emails! Hunter's laptop! WHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTYou're a stuck record playing the world's shittiest song, no arguments, no ideas just noise.
About as "debunked" as Cheney's concession and the nonbinary Joker impressionist who lied about it?