https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/stuff-you-need-to-know/news/?message=50612
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
And people like that have infiltrated the very highest levels of the American judiciary. They think it’s a war…. a religious war where they are the holy ones with God on their side.
So far this show trial hasn’t provided anything in terms of illegality. I shouldn’t call it a trial as hearsay has been permitted. Now they say they’re going to continue into September. How can anyone not see that this is purely political. They think it’s going to help them in the mid term elections. Don’t be surprised when they announce hearings for October and even November.
It's not a trial. It's a hearing. I can see why you would be opposed to the truth coming out. Because you guys look like snivelling, cowardly pieces of sh1t and you can't come up with a single talking point to defend yourselves.
I don’t know what you mean by defending ourselves. Have you defended yourself of the BLM riots you approved of?
I never approved of them. That was just a fake whataboutism you came up with o justify your murderous riot. But it's hard to believe a grown adult would dismiss a hearing into political crimes as being "political". Of course it's political, you dummy. And Republicans are centre-stage and the only ones talking. Notice that once you guys get under oath, suddenly you all become RINOs?
Because it’s all for show. Real investigations aren’t conducted in public, in front of cameras. It also wouldn’t require it to be dragged out over several months. This has gone on longer than the 911 commission. 😂
You're describing Benghazi, and yes the testimony from those hearings exposed it as fake. But this has resulted in the opposite. Rather than exonerate themselves through their testimony like in Benghazi, the witnesses are exposing you guys as the anti-democratic pieces of sh1t you are.And your only defence is "but..it's in front of cameras!!!"
And lets face it... if there were no public hearings, we would probably hear the MAGAchud complain how "the congressional investigations are not valid because they're all done in private".
Much of it is evidence from direct witnesses, not hearsay. Is that pathetic attempt at a lie the onlly talking point they could feed you? And it's all under oath, which (unlike Hillary) Trump would never have the courage to do.
Evidence for what?
Even more pathetic... he mischaracterizes hearsay as "not evidence", but the fact is there are multiple exceptions to the hearsay rule. Much of what was presented in the hearings WOULD be admissible in a court of law.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law
Treason.
Home
Contact
Login
Register