Forum > American Politics
The 5 Filters of the Mass Media Machine
Queefer Sutherland:
Interesting video on Chomsky's theory of "manufacturing consent":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34LGPIXvU5M
What do you think? Truth or not? Some truth, some flaws in this theory?
(didn't know which sub-form to stick this in, so chose US Politics since it's made by Americans)
guest4:
Interesting video. I certainly agree with the last one - the "Common Enemy". But still there are media stories and personalities that run counter to the 'official narrative' so I think the profit motive is the main motivator - media doesn't really care what they are saying as long as people are listening/paying. Perhaps this creates a divisiveness within the audience, and society, that will ultimately work against the corporations/governments/power-brokers?
cybercoma:
I like this thread and want to give it attention when I have the time. I'm just replying so I remember.
segnosaur:
--- Quote from: Moonlight Graham on March 07, 2017, 08:25:53 pm ---Interesting video on Chomsky's theory of "manufacturing consent":
--- End quote ---
Always amazed that people pay so much attention to Chomsky. He was a linguist, not a political scientist or historian. And while he may produce a lot of "research" to back up his claims, the fact that he seems to take such an extreme (and sometimes hypocritical) approach, coupled with some rather questionable mistakes (e.g. discounting the Cambodian genocide) makes me question whether he engaged in that "research" in any sort of rational manner, or simply cherry-picked sources that supported his pre-determined views.
--- Quote ---What do you think? Truth or not? Some truth, some flaws in this theory?
--- End quote ---
Probably incredibly flawed...
I am not assuming the political system and/or the media is perfect; far from it. (The media's inability to handle Trump properly is a prime example of this.) But it is a far cry to go from "There are flaws" to "the whole system is a sham".
Take for example is complaint about companies having a profit motive. Ok, yes.... newspapers and TV stations want to earn money. But, that ignores a few important points:
- Media companies do not have 100% thought control over their employees, and as such published material may not always follow the "profit" model
- Companies earn profit by connecting with viewers/subscribers. Those subscribers are not a monolithic block, and sometimes the way to earn a profit is for the media company to seek out alternative niches to tap into unused markets. In that way, alternative viewpoints (including those that challenge the status quo) can be heard.
I find it ironic that Chomsky would decry the profit motive when his work has gained him a rather loyal following, even though in theory his work should supposedly be "quashed" by the corporate media.
Queefer Sutherland:
--- Quote from: segnosaur on April 13, 2017, 04:01:44 pm ---Always amazed that people pay so much attention to Chomsky. He was a linguist, not a political scientist or historian.
--- End quote ---
Jon Stewart & Rush Limbaugh and a thousand journalist op-ed writers have no political education, but people hang on their words. I don't agree with Chomsky all of the time but I respect him because he's extremely well-read/informed. This thread isn't about Chomsky, this is about his argument.
--- Quote ---I find it ironic that Chomsky would decry the profit motive when his work has gained him a rather loyal following, even though in theory his work should supposedly be "quashed" by the corporate media.
--- End quote ---
When is the last time you remember seeing Chomsky interviewed on CNN or most any other MSM news station?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version