I’m neither, just interested in actual facts, not illogical feelings. It seems this forum is full of feelings, but short on facts much of the time. Has it always been this way here?
you of all members! Your posturing "facts above feelings" is... beyond the pale! Considering your past history of fronting false tabloid/blog based hooey and conspiracy, of you claiming climate related denier statements and positions as factual, you have zero credibility in now claiming an, as you say, "interest in actual facts"!
considering your heightened refusal to accept peer-review consensus science, it's rather comical that you're now drawing reference to a peer-reviewed study - heeelarious!
New Study Says White Police Officers Are Not More Likely To Shoot Minority Suspect
A new peer-reviewed study of fatal police shootings says that white officers are not more likely to shoot and kill minority suspects. Critics contend it doesn't address racial disparities by police.
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/26/745731839/new-study-says-white-police-officers-are-not-more-likely-to-shoot-minority-suspe
by the by, it's a single study; one so relatively new that it has received multiple challenges that necessitated the authors issuing a correction as recent as April 13th, 2020... so recent that additional and/or continued challenges (to the correction) may still yet come forward. The obvious waldo point being: again, it's a single study that, with time, may position to some degree of scientific community acceptance, recognition and overall relevant positioning - may!
but hey now, surely you must recall the waldo highlighting the problem with climate-change deniers, like you, over-hyping a single study - you know, 'SSS' => Single Study Syndrome!
The mainstream media does a disservice to everyone when they sensationalize these types of events. It leads to violence, and irrational behaviour.
does this extend to your boy, badOrangeMan - the greatDividerInChief, forever stoking the U.S. racial divide?