Author Topic: Real Voter Fraud in Nevada.  (Read 459 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online segnosaur

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1557
Re: Real Voter Fraud in Nevada.
« on: December 17, 2020, 02:22:24 pm »
Bit late to the party here...
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/jesse-binnall-voter-fraud-nevada-ballots/2020/12/02/id/999656/

This one is true...
No, its not.

First of all, from MediaBias (https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsmax/)
Overall, we rate Newsmax Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience as well as numerous failed fact checks.

So, your article should be viewed with some skepticism right off the bat.

Then lets look at one of the "claims" made in your article...
One of the witnesses will be a Clark County poll worker who says she observed people near her polling location going to a Biden-Harris van and filling out dozens of ballots to be "fraudulently submitted"

Ummm... sounds pretty dumb to me. Why exactly would these fraudsters use a van with the candidates name on it? Why not just a plain van? And how does this witness know exactly what they were doing?

And by the way, why exactly do these fraudsters need to use so many different methods?

And what was the result of his lawsuit?

From: https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/why-trumps-lawsuit-seeking-to-overturn-nevadas-presidential-race-sputtered-in-court
The election contest lawsuit...was summarily rejected by Carson City District Court Judge James Russell...wrote that the campaign had produced evidence with “little to no value,”...An immediate appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court was also rejected last week, with members of the court issuing a unanimous opinion on Tuesday stating that the Trump campaign failed to demonstrate any “error of law, findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence, or an abuse of discretion in the admission or rejection of evidence by the district court” that would provide grounds for a reversal.


So, judge looked at the evidence, said "this is bunk". The state supreme court looked at the evidence, and said "Yup, this really is bunk".