Waldo I sincerely appreciate the updates.
What I and others I am reading can't figure out is whether there's an actual strategy to win behind this:
Are they just mashing the buttons and muddying the water hoping to discredit the presidency of BIden and maybe break the system if they're lucky?
My anxiety is creeping back up, make me feel better.
perhaps an either/or;
either: politics "disguised" as a legal strategy. That is to say, the 30+ legal filings at the various relevant states level, is the fuel behind the mega-funding blitz on right now; as I understand, 100's of emails soliciting funds have been sent and continue to be regularly sent out to "names on lists" (presumably Trump supporters)... with the emails so pointed as to ask that, for example, "patriots help Trump defend the integrity of the election". Of course, the fine print within these solicitations started by stating:
=> 60% of the funds go first to Trump's Leadership PAC, 'Save America' -- up to the $5,000 legal donation limit -- and then to the Trump campaign's recount account. The remaining 40% will go to the Republican National Committee's operating account. This changed recently to:
=> 75% of the funds go first to Trump's Leadership PAC, 'Save America' -- up to the $5,000 legal donation limit -- and then to the Trump campaign's recount account... with the RNC receiving the remaining 25% donated.
or: something strikes the 'fancy' of at least 4 of the Supreme Court justices required to realize a hearing before the SCOTUS; and again, Trump et al believe the (now) 6-3 Conservative lean of the court favours their side - hence the rush to confirm RBG's replacement before the election (Barrett). Some speculation has vote-counting deadlines, particularly those that relate to mail-in ballots, as something the SCOTUS might accept to hear.