Is that connection more important than child safety.
From what Peter F posted, "child safety" is a red herring. The ruling didn't criticize them being taken from their homes--it criticized what happened afterwards. Do you disagree with the ruling? In other words, do you think these children and their foster families should have been kept in the dark about what bands they were from? Should they have been denied any knowledge of their cultural heritage in that way? The courts didn't say they should have been left with their parents, if I'm reading Peter F correctly. They said that they should have had access to information about who they are and where they are from.
Home
Contact
Login
Register